LF3 Interface: the LF1 ↔ LF2 ↔ LF3 chain closure #
Category: 3-Local (LF3 headline exports: LF3_main_theorem, LF3_finite_leakage_theorem, three chain capstones).
Paper §9.13 / spec §10.5.
Five exported theorems, in descending order of programme-level importance:
LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence_born: repeated singlet trials produce frequencies that converge a.s. to‖cAmp s t (a, b)‖². The Born-rule form of the empirical chain — the reason LF3 exists.LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence: the pre-Born form of the same chain, landing onP_{st}(a, b) = (1 − st a·b)/4.LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence_born_inner: bra-ket variant landing on‖⟨prep.PP.ψ, prep.jed.eig s t⟩‖²— the genuine Hilbert-space inner product between the bundle's pure-preparation vector and the bundle's joint spin eigenstate, viaprep.jed.born_eq_P_st.LF3_main_theorem: eight-conjunct strong-readout package (kernel, correlation, A-marginal, B-marginal, no-signalling on each side, pointer-completeness on each side).LF3_finite_leakage_theorem: four-conjunct finite-leakage stability.
Two-layer architecture: bundle (data) vs theorem (composition) #
The chain capstones in this module follow a deliberate bundle + theorem separation:
The
PureSingletPreparation D ctx Nbundle (LF3.PurePreparation) carries the load-bearing hypotheses needed by the empirical chain: the posited fibre trial lawμψ, the projective reference measure + measure bridge, the static pure preparationPPoverμψ(with Dirac concentration), the joint spin eigenstate datajed(with the Born identity hypothesis‖⟨PP.ψ, eig s t⟩‖² = P_st), and the major hypothesisbridge_op_p(ontic outcome weight ↔ OP.p — the LF4-todo §2 + §7 discharge target). The bundle's fields are data: they encode what the caller must supply to apply the theorem.The chain capstone theorems (
LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence,_born,_born_inner, plus the_jointvariants) are theorem compositions on top of the bundle. They take i.i.d. trialsX : ℕ → Ω → Σwith common lawμψ(the posited fibre law) and compose the bundle's hypotheses with three external pieces:LF1.GeneralFrequency.freq_tendsto_of_iid— the law-agnostic SLLN frequency limit (axiom-free; the posited-fibre replacement forLF1_main_theorem_ae, whoseμL-conditionalprepMeasurecannot model a fibre-concentrated pure preparation under the measure bridge);LF3.OP_p_at_jointEig_eq_P_st_direct— the rank-1 step the capstones actually take (ontic-stratum, Busch-free, viaLF2.PurePreparation.born_rank_one_direct); the Busch-mediated twinOP_p_at_jointEig_eq_P_stis retained as the operational-stratum statement but is not on the capstone path (AXIOMS.md §2.4);LF3.Singlet.Kernel.cst_squared_eq— algebraicP_st = ‖cAmp‖²(axiom-free). The two further conceptual pieces named below (sectorVolume_eq_LF2_Born,LF1_main_theorem_projective) are whatprep.weight_eq_P_st(and therebybridge_op_p) packages for the theorem composition.
A fully discharged chain at LF4 would unfold the bundle into the following composition:
Projectors.LF2Interface.sectorVolume_eq_LF2_Born(LF3 → LF2 Born form)LF2.Interface.LF1_main_theorem_projective(LF2 → LF1 frequency limit)LF1.GeneralFrequency.freq_tendsto_of_iid(fibre-law a.s. convergence)Singlet.Kernel.cst_squared_eq(algebraic core, axiom-free)
Pre-LF4, the proof bodies below consume the bundle's
weight_eq_P_st theorem (which itself composes bridge_op_p with
OP_p_at_jointEig_eq_P_st); sectorVolume_eq_LF2_Born enters
through weight_eq_P_st once LF4 supplies the structural
constructor. The reader should track:
- What's proven: the theorem composition machinery, sorry-free.
- What's assumed: everything packed into
prep : PureSingletPreparation.
Strong-readout main theorem (paper §9.13) #
PACKAGING-ONLY: zero new content. Body is an anonymous-record
⟨context_singlet_kernel, context_correlation_eq_neg_dot, context_marginal_a, context_marginal_b, no_signalling_strong_readout_a, no_signalling_strong_readout_b, pointer_a_complete, pointer_b_complete⟩ over eight separately-exported
theorems. The "main theorem" label is a labelled handle on existing
content; no proof obligation is discharged here that is not discharged
by the conjuncts individually. See PLACEHOLDERS.md §9.
LF3_main_theorem — eight-conjunct strong-readout package.
Conjuncts (paper §9.13 + §7.10 + §2.8):
- Singlet kernel
P_st = (1 − st·a·b)/4. - Bell-singlet correlation
∑ st · P_st = −a·b. - A-marginal
∑_t P_st = 1/2. - B-marginal
∑_s P_st = 1/2. - Operational no-signalling, A side.
- Operational no-signalling, B side.
- Pointer-completeness on the A wing.
- Pointer-completeness on the B wing.
Finite-leakage main theorem (paper §9.13 §7) #
PACKAGING-ONLY: zero new content. Body is an anonymous-record
over four separately-exported theorems
(singlet_pointer_probability_finite_leakage, correlation_finite_leakage_bound,
marginal_a_finite_leakage_bound, marginal_b_finite_leakage_bound).
The "theorem" label is a labelled handle on existing content. See
PLACEHOLDERS.md §9.
LF3_finite_leakage_theorem — four-conjunct finite-leakage stability.
Each conjunct gives a quantitative deviation bound from the strong-readout
ideal. The leakage parameters εA, εB are supplied through a
LeakageCompat structure parameterising the abstract pointer/measurement
data; in the strong-readout limit εA = εB = 0 and each bound reduces to
the corresponding strong-readout identity from LF3_main_theorem.
LF1 ↔ LF2 ↔ LF3 empirical chain (paper §9.13, spec §10.5) #
The full empirical interpretation chain, under the option (B) design (2026-05-18):
LF3 pointer-sector weight P_st(a, b)
= (via born_rank_one_direct + jed.born_eq_P_st = OP_p_at_jointEig_eq_P_st_direct)
OP.p (rankOneEffect (jed.eig s t))
= (via prep.bridge_op_p, the LF4 discharge target)
μψ((prep.O_region s t).preEvent)
= (via LF1.GeneralFrequency.freq_tendsto_of_iid)
fibre trial-frequency limit lim M→∞ (1/M) ∑ 𝟙_{O_{st}}(X i ω)
The chain bridge prep.bridge_op_p discharges the ontic outcome weight
under the posited fibre law μψ as
ENNReal.ofReal (OP.p (rankOneEffect (jed.eig s t))), where the OP is
built from μFS + bridge + μψ + PP.rep via
LF2.OperationalPackage.fromPreparation. The OP.p ↔ P_st identity is
discharged (on the capstone path) by LF3.OP_p_at_jointEig_eq_P_st_direct,
the Busch-free ontic-stratum step via
LF2.PurePreparation.born_rank_one_direct; this is why every chain capstone
is foundational-triple-only. The Busch-mediated twin
OP_p_at_jointEig_eq_P_st (via LF2.pure_state_born_weights_of_certainty)
is retained as the operational-stratum statement but is not on the capstone
path (the 2026-06-02 re-route, AXIOMS.md §2.4). The frequency limit is
LF1.freq_tendsto_of_iid applied to i.i.d. trials X : ℕ → Ω → Σ with
common law μψ — not LF1_main_theorem_ae, whose μL-conditional
prepMeasure is incompatible with a fibre-concentrated pure preparation
under the continuous measure bridge (see PurePreparation.lean and
LF4-todo §8). LF4-todo §2 (preparation ↔ Hilbert correspondence) and §7
(projective-first outcomes) are the two LF4 work items behind the
bridge_op_p hypothesis.
Pre-Born form of the empirical chain. For each (s, t) pointer
sector, the empirical frequency of prep.O_region s t over
repeated trials converges almost surely to P_{st}(a, b) = (1 − st a·b)/4,
given:
- an LF2 sector structure
Dwith projectionπ, - a
PureSingletPreparation D ctx Nbundle (option (B)) supplying: the posited fibre trial lawμψ, the projective reference measureμFS+ measure bridge, the static pure preparationPPoverμψwith rep + Dirac concentration, the joint spin eigenstate datajedforctx(with the Born identity‖⟨PP.ψ, eig s t⟩‖² = P_st), the ontic outcome regions, and the bridgeμψ((O_region s t).preEvent) = OP.p ↔ rank-1 sector effect(LF4 discharge target), - i.i.d. trials
X : ℕ → Ω → Σover a probability spacePrwhose common law is the fibre lawμψ(hlaw), - pairwise independence of the trial indicators on the
(prep.O_region s t).preEventfamily.
Born-mediated form of the empirical chain (closed-form amplitude).
Identifies the pre-Born target P_{st}(a, b) with the squared
closed-form singlet amplitude ‖cAmp s t (a, b)‖² via cst_squared_eq.
cAmp is the real-valued representative √P_st; the bra-ket form
‖⟨v, ψ⁻⟩‖² is recovered by LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence_born_inner
below, given an actual joint spin eigenstate v.
HYPOTHESIS-DOES-THE-WORK: rewrites the pre-Born conclusion via
the bundle field prep.jed.born_eq_P_st, which IS the Born identity
for the joint spin eigenstate. The conclusion Tendsto … (‖⟨ψ, eig s t⟩‖²)
is equivalent to the pre-Born conclusion under this bundled identity.
The Born identity is the entire content of the rewrite. See
PLACEHOLDERS.md §10. The bundle field is catalogued at
BRIDGE-OBLIGATIONS.md §2.1 (LF4-todo §2 + §7).
Born-form empirical chain with a genuine bra-ket amplitude. The
empirical frequency converges to ‖⟨ψ, eig s t⟩‖² where eig s t is
the joint spin eigenstate |s_a, t_b⟩ supplied by the bundle's
prep.jed, and ψ = prep.PP.ψ is the pure-preparation Hilbert vector.
The Born identity ‖⟨PP.ψ, eig s t⟩‖² = P_st ctx.a ctx.b s t is the
bundled field prep.jed.born_eq_P_st (the LF4-todo §2 + §7 discharge
target carried as a structural hypothesis pre-LF4).
This is the **physically faithful** form of the LF1↔LF2↔LF3 chain: the
RHS is a genuine Hilbert-space inner product between the bundle's
pure-preparation vector and the bundle's joint spin eigenstate, not a
closed-form repackaging and not an unbound caller-supplied vector.
Joint partition convergence (Phase 8) #
The per-sector capstones above give ∀ s t, ∀ᵐ ω, Tendsto ... — the
order is "for each sector, a.s. convergence to that sector's P_st".
For chain consumers that need the joint a.s. statement — "almost surely,
for every sector simultaneously the empirical frequency converges to
the corresponding P_st" — the order swaps to ∀ᵐ ω, ∀ s t, Tendsto ....
The swap is a finite-intersection-of-full-measure-sets argument:
Sign × Sign is finite (hence countable), and Mathlib's
MeasureTheory.ae_all_iff provides the swap for countable index types.
This is the standard "joint vs per-element" upgrade pattern.
Joint partition convergence (pre-Born form). Almost surely on
the trial-sequence probability space, for every pointer sector
(s, t) simultaneously the empirical frequency of
prep.O_region s t converges to P_st ctx.a ctx.b s t. Cf.
LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence which gives the per-sector
statement.
Joint partition convergence (Born form, closed-form amplitude).
Almost surely, for every (s, t) the empirical frequency converges
to ‖cAmp ctx.a ctx.b s t‖². Joint version of
LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence_born.
Joint partition convergence (Born form, bra-ket amplitude).
Almost surely, for every (s, t) the empirical frequency converges
to ‖⟨prep.PP.ψ, prep.jed.eig s t⟩‖². Joint version of
LF3_singlet_frequency_convergence_born_inner.