Empirical/QM/LeggettGarg: the Leggett–Garg inequality and its quantum violation #
The Leggett–Garg inequality (LGI) is the temporal analogue of CHSH: a test of
macrorealism using a single dichotomic observable Q(t) ∈ {±1} measured at three times.
Any macrorealist model (definite values + non-invasive measurability) obeys the K₃ bound
K₃ := ⟨Q₁Q₂⟩ + ⟨Q₂Q₃⟩ − ⟨Q₁Q₃⟩ ≤ 1.
Quantum mechanics violates it. For a two-level system with Q = σ_z precessing under
e^{-iΔσ_x} (the QuantumZeno.zenoU rotation), the Born two-time correlation is
⟨QᵢQⱼ⟩ = cos(2Δ_{ij}), giving K₃(Δ) = 2cos(2Δ) − cos(4Δ), which peaks at the Lüders bound
3/2 at Δ = π/6 — well above the macrorealist 1.
Results (all foundational-triple, no sorry):
lg_macrorealist_bound— theK₃ ≤ 1bound over a genuine measure-theoretic macrorealist model (probability space with three±1observables), mirroring the CHSH LHV bound inEmpirical/QM/Crypto/E91.lean;lgCorr_eq— the Born two-time correlation= cos(2Δ), derived fromzenoU(not asserted);lg_qm_value—K₃(Δ) = 2cos(2Δ) − cos(4Δ);lg_violation—K₃(π/6) = 3/2;lg_macrorealist_bound_violated—1 < 3/2.
Experimental verification: Palacios-Laloy et al. 2010 (superconducting qubit); Knee et al. 2012; many since. CSD note: the macrorealist "non-invasive measurability" assumption is exactly what the record layer / de-isolation reading denies — an intermediate measurement forms a record (de-isolates), so CSD is realist yet LG-violating, consistent with QM.
References #
Empirical/CSD/QuantumZeno.lean (zenoU, the qubit rotation + Born machinery);
Empirical/QM/Bell.lean / Empirical/QM/Crypto/E91.lean (the CHSH analogue + LHV bound pattern).
Part 1 — the macrorealist (classical) bound K₃ ≤ 1 #
The macrorealist Leggett–Garg bound K₃ ≤ 1. For any macrorealist model — a probability
space carrying three dichotomic ±1 observables Q₁, Q₂, Q₃ — the temporal combination
⟨Q₁Q₂⟩ + ⟨Q₂Q₃⟩ − ⟨Q₁Q₃⟩ ≤ 1. A genuine measure-theoretic hidden-variable bound (the temporal
analogue of the CHSH LHV bound), proved from the pointwise inequality by integral monotonicity.
Part 2 — the quantum two-time correlation (Born + qubit precession) #
σ_z eigenvalue of the computational basis state i: +1 for |0⟩, −1 for |1⟩.
Equations
Instances For
Born transition probability |⟨e_t, e^{-iΔσ_x} e_s⟩|² between σ_z-eigenstates under
precession by Δ (zenoU Δ).
Equations
Instances For
The Born transition amplitude is the matrix entry: ⟨e_t, zenoU Δ · e_s⟩ = (zenoU Δ) t s.
The Born transition probability is |matrix entry|².
The Born two-time correlation ⟨Q(0)Q(Δ)⟩ of σ_z under precession by Δ, with
intermediate collapse: ∑_{s,t} sgn(s)·sgn(t)·½·|⟨e_t, zenoU Δ · e_s⟩|².
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Part 3 — the K₃ combination and its quantum violation #
The Leggett–Garg K₃ combination for equal time-steps Δ:
K₃(Δ) = ⟨Q₁Q₂⟩ + ⟨Q₂Q₃⟩ − ⟨Q₁Q₃⟩ = 2·lgCorr Δ − lgCorr (2Δ) (adjacent pairs at separation
Δ, outer pair at separation 2Δ).
Equations
Instances For
The macrorealist Leggett–Garg bound value 1.
Instances For
The macrorealist bound is violated: 1 < K₃(π/6) = 3/2. The numerical gap is the empirical
falsification of macrorealism (Palacios-Laloy 2010 and successors).