Documentation

CsdLean4.Empirical.CSD.QuantumZeno

Empirical/CSD: the quantum Zeno effect (Build 15d) #

Category: 3-Local (CSD-ontic volume layer; the freezing-under-frequent-measurement entry of the open-system tranche, after einselection (15a), QEC-decoherence (15b), and weak measurement (15c)).

A watched system does not evolve. Frequent projective measurements onto the initial state freeze the dynamics: the survival probability tends to one as the number of measurements grows. This file derives the mechanism and the limit, then states the honest CSD reading.

Part A: the Zeno mechanism (quadratic short-time decay, DERIVED) #

For a Hermitian H and unit ψ the survival amplitude is a(s) = ⟨ψ, exp(-isH) ψ⟩ and the survival probability P(s) = ‖a(s)‖². The Zeno mechanism is the quadratic short-time behaviour: the initial decay slope vanishes (P'(0) = 0) and the leading correction is -(ΔH)²s² for the variance (ΔH)² = ⟨ψ,H²ψ⟩ − ⟨ψ,Hψ⟩².

Concrete qubit witness. This file realises the mechanism on the witness H = σx, ψ = |0⟩, where the evolution is the closed-form qubit rotation exp(-isσx) = cos s · I − i sin s · σx (zenoU; the standard matrix-exponential identity for the involution σx²=I, taken as the closed form, not re-derived from Matrix.exp). Everything downstream is then derived:

Part B: the Zeno limit (freezing, DERIVED) #

n equally-spaced projective re-measurements onto |0⟩ over a fixed total time t give survival P_n = P(t/n)^n (zenoSurvival). Then:

Non-vacuity. (ΔH)² = 1 > 0 (zeno_variance_pos): |0⟩ is not a σx-eigenstate, so absent measurement the state genuinely evolves -- at s = π/2 the survival is 0 (zeno_no_measurement_decays, the state has fully precessed away). The freezing is a real effect of the repeated measurement, not a fixed-point triviality. (For an eigenstate (ΔH)²=0 the result is trivial; the genuine Zeno case is (ΔH)²>0.)

Part C: the CSD reading and its D1 gating #

The honest CSD reading: each projective measurement re-carves the Σ-volume onto the initial sector |0⟩; frequent re-carving freezes the ontic-volume evolution, and the survival probability P_n → 1 is the ontic volume staying concentrated on the initial sector. The single-step survival P(s) = ‖⟨0, zenoU s·0⟩‖² is the rank-1 Born weight of the |0⟩ outcome, which the moment-map / Duistermaat-Heckman cluster (fs_born_volume_ratio_N, imported one layer down, Gleason-free) reads as a Fubini-Study volume ratio on the ontic Σ; this file does not re-prove that and does not fake a new volume theorem.

The dynamical realisation -- the measurement-interspersed Σ-flow Φ whose iteration freezes the ontic trajectory, the Zeno limit as a property of the de-isolation flow -- is D1-gated to LF6 (Φ = id in every concrete SectorData). What is delivered here is the operational / survival-probability freezing; the ontic-flow realisation is not claimed.

All exports are foundational-triple-only (no busch_effect_gleason): concrete Matrix algebra over EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin 2), real trigonometric inequalities, and the Bernoulli / squeeze limit.

The witness observable and the closed-form qubit rotation #

The measurement observable σx = !![0,1;1,0] (the unit Pauli-X axis). The preparation |0⟩ (WeakMeasurement.e0) is not an eigenstate of σx, so it genuinely evolves.

Equations
Instances For

    σx² = I (the Pauli involution).

    The closed-form qubit rotation zenoU s = cos s · I − i sin s · σx, i.e. exp(-isσx) (the standard matrix-exponential identity for the involution σx²=I, with θ = -is; taken as the closed form, not re-derived from Matrix.exp). It is the deterministic, unitary evolution generated by σx for a time s.

    Equations
    Instances For

      zenoU s = cos s · I − i sin s · σx (the closed-form linkage to exp(-isσx)).

      The ⟨0, M·0⟩ sandwich on the qubit #

      The diagonal sandwich ⟨0, M·0⟩ = M₀₀ on the |0⟩ preparation.

      Part A: survival amplitude, probability, and the variance #

      The survival amplitude a(s) = ⟨0, exp(-isσx)·0⟩ on the |0⟩ preparation.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The survival probability P(s) = ‖a(s)‖².

        Equations
        Instances For

          (Part A) The survival amplitude is cos s -- derived from the matrix zenoU s, not asserted.

          (Part A) The survival probability is cos² s.

          The mean ⟨H⟩ = ⟨0, σx·0⟩.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            The second moment ⟨H²⟩ = ⟨0, σx²·0⟩.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              ⟨H⟩ = 0: |0⟩ is centred on the σx axis (computed from the matrix).

              ⟨H²⟩ = 1: from σx² = I and ‖|0⟩‖ = 1.

              (Part A) The variance (ΔH)² = 1 -- computed from the matrices, not assumed. This is the coefficient in the quadratic bound below.

              (Part A, non-vacuity) (ΔH)² > 0: |0⟩ is not a σx-eigenstate, so the state genuinely evolves absent measurement.

              (Part A core) The Zeno mechanism: quadratic short-time bound P(s) ≥ 1 − (ΔH)²·s². Derived from cos²s = 1 − sin²s ≥ 1 − s² with the coefficient equal to the computed variance. The quadratic (not linear) leading behaviour is the freezing mechanism.

              (Part A) Zero initial decay slope P'(0) = 0. The survival probability has a vanishing first derivative at s = 0; this is the precise sense in which a watched system does not begin to evolve. Proved via HasDerivAt on s ↦ cos² s.

              Part B: the Zeno limit (freezing under frequent measurement) #

              theorem CSD.Empirical.CSDBridge.QuantumZeno.pow_lower {P u : } (n : ) (hP : 0 P) (hPu : 1 - u P) (_hu : 0 u) :
              1 - n * u P ^ n

              Bernoulli + monotonicity helper: if 0 ≤ P, 1 − u ≤ P, 0 ≤ u, then 1 − n·u ≤ P^n.

              n equally-spaced projective re-measurements onto |0⟩ over total time t: the survival probability P_n = P(t/n)^n.

              Equations
              Instances For

                (Part B) The Zeno lower bound P_n ≥ 1 − (ΔH)²t²/n. Derived from the Part-A quadratic bound plus Bernoulli's inequality.

                (Part B headline) The Zeno freezing theorem. Under n → ∞ equally-spaced projective re-measurements over a fixed total time t, the survival probability tends to one: a watched system does not evolve. Proved by squeezing 1 − (ΔH)²t²/n ≤ P_n ≤ 1.

                (Part B, non-vacuity) Without measurement the state decays. At the single time s = π/2 the survival probability is 0: |0⟩ precesses entirely off the σx axis. So the freezing zeno_freezing is a genuine effect of the repeated measurement, contrasting the free evolution that would carry the state away.

                (Non-vacuity bundle) The genuine Zeno regime: positive variance (the state would evolve) together with full free decay at s = π/2 (it does evolve, maximally), against which the freezing limit is non-trivial.