Empirical/CSD: the quantum Zeno effect (Build 15d) #
Category: 3-Local (CSD-ontic volume layer; the freezing-under-frequent-measurement entry of the open-system tranche, after einselection (15a), QEC-decoherence (15b), and weak measurement (15c)).
A watched system does not evolve. Frequent projective measurements onto the initial state freeze the dynamics: the survival probability tends to one as the number of measurements grows. This file derives the mechanism and the limit, then states the honest CSD reading.
Part A: the Zeno mechanism (quadratic short-time decay, DERIVED) #
For a Hermitian H and unit ψ the survival amplitude is a(s) = ⟨ψ, exp(-isH) ψ⟩ and
the survival probability P(s) = ‖a(s)‖². The Zeno mechanism is the quadratic short-time
behaviour: the initial decay slope vanishes (P'(0) = 0) and the leading correction is
-(ΔH)²s² for the variance (ΔH)² = ⟨ψ,H²ψ⟩ − ⟨ψ,Hψ⟩².
Concrete qubit witness. This file realises the mechanism on the witness H = σx,
ψ = |0⟩, where the evolution is the closed-form qubit rotation
exp(-isσx) = cos s · I − i sin s · σx (zenoU; the standard matrix-exponential identity
for the involution σx²=I, taken as the closed form, not re-derived from Matrix.exp).
Everything downstream is then derived:
- the survival amplitude
a(s) = ⟨0, zenoU s · 0⟩ = cos s(survAmp_eq), soP(s) = cos² s(survProb_eq) -- the genuine matrix computation, not asserted; - the variance
(ΔH)² = ⟨0,σx²·0⟩ − ⟨0,σx·0⟩² = 1 − 0 = 1(varH_eq), computed from the matrices (meanH_eq,meanHsq_eq); - the quadratic bound
P(s) ≥ 1 − (ΔH)²·s²(zeno_survival_quadratic), derived fromcos²s = 1 − sin²s ≥ 1 − s²(Real.sin_sq_le_sq); the coefficient is exactly the variance, not a free parameter -- this is the physics, not a hypothesis; - the zero initial slope
P'(0) = 0(zeno_survival_slope_zero), viaHasDerivAtons ↦ cos² s. This zero slope is why frequent measurement freezes evolution.
Part B: the Zeno limit (freezing, DERIVED) #
n equally-spaced projective re-measurements onto |0⟩ over a fixed total time t give
survival P_n = P(t/n)^n (zenoSurvival). Then:
zeno_survival_lower_bound:P_n ≥ 1 − (ΔH)²t²/n, derived from the Part-A quadratic bound plus Bernoulli's inequality(1−x)^n ≥ 1 − nx(one_add_mul_le_pow);zeno_freezing(headline):Tendsto (fun n => P_n) atTop (nhds 1)-- frequent measurement freezes the state -- by squeezing1 − (ΔH)²t²/n ≤ P_n ≤ 1between two sequences tending to one (tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le). The full squeeze is proved, not just the lower bound.
Non-vacuity. (ΔH)² = 1 > 0 (zeno_variance_pos): |0⟩ is not a σx-eigenstate,
so absent measurement the state genuinely evolves -- at s = π/2 the survival is 0
(zeno_no_measurement_decays, the state has fully precessed away). The freezing is a real
effect of the repeated measurement, not a fixed-point triviality. (For an eigenstate
(ΔH)²=0 the result is trivial; the genuine Zeno case is (ΔH)²>0.)
Part C: the CSD reading and its D1 gating #
The honest CSD reading: each projective measurement re-carves the Σ-volume onto the
initial sector |0⟩; frequent re-carving freezes the ontic-volume evolution, and the
survival probability P_n → 1 is the ontic volume staying concentrated on the initial
sector. The single-step survival P(s) = ‖⟨0, zenoU s·0⟩‖² is the rank-1 Born weight of
the |0⟩ outcome, which the moment-map / Duistermaat-Heckman cluster
(fs_born_volume_ratio_N, imported one layer down, Gleason-free) reads as a
Fubini-Study volume ratio on the ontic Σ; this file does not re-prove that and does not
fake a new volume theorem.
The dynamical realisation -- the measurement-interspersed Σ-flow Φ whose iteration
freezes the ontic trajectory, the Zeno limit as a property of the de-isolation flow -- is
D1-gated to LF6 (Φ = id in every concrete SectorData). What is delivered here is
the operational / survival-probability freezing; the ontic-flow realisation is not claimed.
All exports are foundational-triple-only (no busch_effect_gleason): concrete Matrix
algebra over EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin 2), real trigonometric inequalities, and the Bernoulli
/ squeeze limit.
The witness observable and the closed-form qubit rotation #
The measurement observable σx = !![0,1;1,0] (the unit Pauli-X axis). The preparation
|0⟩ (WeakMeasurement.e0) is not an eigenstate of σx, so it genuinely evolves.
Equations
- CSD.Empirical.CSDBridge.QuantumZeno.σx = !![0, 1; 1, 0]
Instances For
The closed-form qubit rotation zenoU s = cos s · I − i sin s · σx, i.e.
exp(-isσx) (the standard matrix-exponential identity for the involution σx²=I, with
θ = -is; taken as the closed form, not re-derived from Matrix.exp). It is the
deterministic, unitary evolution generated by σx for a time s.
Equations
Instances For
The ⟨0, M·0⟩ sandwich on the qubit #
The diagonal sandwich ⟨0, M·0⟩ = M₀₀ on the |0⟩ preparation.
Part A: survival amplitude, probability, and the variance #
The survival amplitude a(s) = ⟨0, exp(-isσx)·0⟩ on the |0⟩ preparation.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The survival probability P(s) = ‖a(s)‖².
Equations
Instances For
The mean ⟨H⟩ = ⟨0, σx·0⟩.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The second moment ⟨H²⟩ = ⟨0, σx²·0⟩.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The variance (ΔH)² = ⟨H²⟩ − ⟨H⟩².
Equations
Instances For
⟨H⟩ = 0: |0⟩ is centred on the σx axis (computed from the matrix).
⟨H²⟩ = 1: from σx² = I and ‖|0⟩‖ = 1.
(Part A) The variance (ΔH)² = 1 -- computed from the matrices, not assumed. This
is the coefficient in the quadratic bound below.
(Part A, non-vacuity) (ΔH)² > 0: |0⟩ is not a σx-eigenstate, so the state
genuinely evolves absent measurement.
(Part A core) The Zeno mechanism: quadratic short-time bound
P(s) ≥ 1 − (ΔH)²·s². Derived from cos²s = 1 − sin²s ≥ 1 − s² with the coefficient
equal to the computed variance. The quadratic (not linear) leading behaviour is the
freezing mechanism.
(Part A) Zero initial decay slope P'(0) = 0. The survival probability has a
vanishing first derivative at s = 0; this is the precise sense in which a watched system
does not begin to evolve. Proved via HasDerivAt on s ↦ cos² s.
Part B: the Zeno limit (freezing under frequent measurement) #
n equally-spaced projective re-measurements onto |0⟩ over total time t: the
survival probability P_n = P(t/n)^n.
Equations
Instances For
(Part B headline) The Zeno freezing theorem. Under n → ∞ equally-spaced
projective re-measurements over a fixed total time t, the survival probability tends to
one: a watched system does not evolve. Proved by squeezing 1 − (ΔH)²t²/n ≤ P_n ≤ 1.
(Part B, non-vacuity) Without measurement the state decays. At the single time
s = π/2 the survival probability is 0: |0⟩ precesses entirely off the σx axis. So
the freezing zeno_freezing is a genuine effect of the repeated measurement, contrasting
the free evolution that would carry the state away.
(Non-vacuity bundle) The genuine Zeno regime: positive variance (the state would
evolve) together with full free decay at s = π/2 (it does evolve, maximally), against
which the freezing limit is non-trivial.