Documentation

CsdLean4.SigmaLayer.FiniteQMClosure

SigmaLayer/FiniteQMClosure: the tiered finite-dimensional QM closure (#6) #

Category: 7-SigmaLayer (the projective-sector layer (Paper C)).

The capstone bundle. Every earlier module proves ONE reconstructed fact on the single many-to-one ontic model productDynamics H hH p₀ (isolated Hamiltonian flow exp(-itH) on Σ = ℂℙ^M × T², Liouville measure μL = μFS ⊗ vol, projection π = Prod.fst). This module collects the ones that are GENUINELY PROVED on that model into a single record FiniteQMClosure, discharged by unifiedFiniteQMClosure, and — crucially — states honestly, tier by tier, what is a theorem here, what is a projective-sector posit, what is a textbook-QM adapter, and what is still open. No field is sorry; the structure carries only real theorems, and the non-theorem tiers live in this docstring, not in fabricated fields.

This is a concrete consistency witness, not a derivation of the Paper C architecture. The model productDynamics H hH p₀ has μL = μFS ⊗ vol and Φ_t = (e^{-itH}·[p], θ) built IN, so the pushforward-to-μFS (fubini_study_bridge) and the Schrödinger projection (schrodinger_projection) are compatibility facts about the witness — NOT derivations of projective geometry, the Fubini–Study measure, or unitary evolution from a more primitive ontic model. The precise claim unifiedFiniteQMClosure earns is: operational finite-QM closure holds on a concrete projective product witness satisfying the exact formalised subset of the Paper C assumptions (specs/reconstruction-status.md §2, the A1–A7 map). It does NOT claim the witness derives that architecture. The two genuinely open frontiers sit OUTSIDE this closure: SO-1 (the sector-origin problem — the origin of (Σ, π, μL); the trials SAMPLE μL) and MD-1 (the Paper C A7 mismatch — the measurement cells bornRegion ψ' are preparation-indexed, not the context-fixed Ωᵢ(M) of A7; the readout here is an honest preparation-indexed operational witness). See specs/BACKLOG.md (SO-1, MD-1).

Tier 1 — PROVED on the unified model (the fields of FiniteQMClosure) #

All eleven on the ONE model productDynamics H hH p₀:

Tier 2 — ASSUMED under projective sector #

The interpretive commitment that makes the above a reconstruction of QM rather than a study of a measure space: taking the Fubini-Study/Liouville measure on ℂℙ^M × T² to BE the ontic probability law (projective sector; see specs/future-work.md). This is a stance, not a Lean proposition, and is deliberately NOT a field. The structural sub-posits that a bare Choice-A reconstruction would ALSO assume are, on this concrete model, already DISCHARGED (hence they appear as tier-1 fubini_study_bridge etc., not here) — with one honest exception recorded separately:

Tier 3 — QM ADAPTERS (restatements into textbook QM, elsewhere) #

SigmaLayer/Adapters.lean, SigmaLayer/CompositeAdapters.lean: the maps taking these ontic facts to their standard Hilbert-space QM statements (density operators, Lüders channel, Born rule). They translate; they do not add reconstruction content.

Open residue (outside the closure) #

The mixed-state / ensemble representation (#8) that was once "Tier 4 open" is now fully closed and lives in the closure as fields: the statistical side (#8 A+B, SigmaLayer/MixedEnsemble.lean), the ontic-side WEIGHT-level representation (mixed_born / mixed_ontic_born_weight), AND the a.s. FREQUENCY LLN (mixed_born_frequency / unified_mixed_born_frequency, SigmaLayer/MixedFrequency.lean). So the closure's QM content is complete on the witness. What remains open is NOT a QM item but the two architecture frontiers already named above:

References #

specs/future-work.md (SL-T5, SL-T6, projective sector); specs/reconstruction-status.md; specs/connectivity-manifest.md (L9). Source theorems: unified_projectiveSector_capstone (SigmaLayer/UnifiedMeasurement.lean), unified_records_persistence, unified_born_frequency (SigmaLayer/UnifiedFlowedRecords.lean), conditioning_luders_effect_equivalence (SigmaLayer/ConditioningLuders.lean), CompositeSector.ofReconstruction (SigmaLayer/TensorReconstruction.lean).

structure CSD.SigmaLayer.FiniteQMClosure {N M : } [NeZero N] (H : Matrix (Fin (M + 1)) (Fin (M + 1)) ) (hH : H.IsHermitian) (p₀ : LF4.CPN (M + 1)) (e : Fin N × Fin N Fin (M + 1)) (ψ' : EuclideanSpace (Fin (M + 1))) (hψ'0 : ψ' 0) (ψ : EuclideanSpace (Fin (M + 1))) (hψ0 : ψ 0) :

The tiered finite-dimensional QM closure (Tier 1). A record of exactly the reconstructed QM facts that are GENUINELY PROVED on the single ontic model productDynamics H hH p₀ (measurement reference state ψ', Born state ψ). Every field is a theorem discharged by unifiedFiniteQMClosure; the projective-sector posit, QM adapters, and open residue are documented in the module header, not encoded as fields.

Instances For
    theorem CSD.SigmaLayer.unifiedFiniteQMClosure {N M : } [NeZero N] (H : Matrix (Fin (M + 1)) (Fin (M + 1)) ) (hH : H.IsHermitian) (p₀ : LF4.CPN (M + 1)) (e : Fin N × Fin N Fin (M + 1)) (ψ' : EuclideanSpace (Fin (M + 1))) (hψ'0 : ψ' 0) (ψ : EuclideanSpace (Fin (M + 1))) (hψ0 : ψ 0) (hψ' : ψ' = 1) ( : ψ = 1) :
    FiniteQMClosure H hH p₀ e ψ' hψ'0 ψ hψ0

    The finite-dimensional QM closure holds on the unified model. Every tier-1 field is discharged by its source lemma on the single ontic model productDynamics H hH p₀. Requires only the normalisations of the measurement reference state ψ' and the Born state ψ — the whole reconstruction (dynamics, measurement, records, Born frequency, conditioning=Lüders) is a theorem on one model, with the projective-sector posit and open residue (SO-1, MD-1) as documented (module header), not as hidden gaps.