The typicality price of a majority record #
Category: 7-SigmaLayer (the record layer — Paper C A7).
BACKLOG #140, out of the scope note MacrostateStability.lean and
PointerConcentration.lean share.
Both of those files end on the same unfinished sentence.
MacrostateStability.lean (#103) proves its majority half only under
1 − ε ≤ c.rate p i, and says of the Fubini–Study statistics that "those are statements about
base statistics, they live at a different place in Σ, and no theorem joins them to the
fibre bound proved here". PointerConcentration.lean (#105) supplies
the hypothesis geometrically — nearness to a pointer ray — and records in prose that "for a
generic superposition no cell is overwhelming, and that is correct physics rather than a gap".
This file turns that prose into a theorem, and the answer is quantitative and negative: base
typicality does not supply #103's hypothesis, it argues against it, with a price that vanishes
like 1/N.
What is proved #
- ★★
fsMeasure_momentMap_dev_le— one outcome's weight concentrates at1/N.fs_chebyshev_concentrationis stated for a linear statistic∑ λₖ xₖ; at the selectorλ = δᵢit becomes a statement about a single Born weight, which is the form the record layer consumes: a Fubini–Study preparation has|momentMap p i − 1/N| < toutside a set of measure at most(N − 1)/(N²(N + 1)t²). - ★★★
fsMeasure_momentMap_ge_le— the majority hypothesis is atypical: the preparations whose outcomeicarries weight1 − εor more have Fubini–Study measure at most(N − 1)/(N²(N + 1)(1 − ε − 1/N)²), which isO(1/N²)for fixedε. The inclusion is the whole proof — a weight at least1 − εis a deviation of at least1 − ε − 1/Nfrom the typical value. - ★★★
fsMeasure_exists_momentMap_ge_leand its clean reading ★★fsMeasure_exists_momentMap_ge_le_inv— typically no outcome at all is a majority. The union bound over theNoutcomes costs one factorN, leavingO(1/N), so the statement survives being asked of the whole context rather than of a chosen outcome. - ★★★
fsMeasure_exists_majority_basin_le— the join, in #103's own vocabulary: the preparations at which some basin of the canonical context carries epistemic measure1 − εor more have Fubini–Study measure at most1/(N(1 − ε − 1/N)²). This is the theorem #103's scope note says is missing, and it goes throughglobalBasin_prob— a cell's measure is its Born weight, so a statement about weights is a statement about cells with nothing in between. - ★★
tendsto_majorityBound— and the price vanishes: for anyε < 1the bound tends to0as the dimension grows. So the majority hypothesis is not merely untypical at fixedN; it becomes arbitrarily untypical.
What this says about #103 and #105, and what it does not #
It explains why #105 had to be geometric. #103's hypothesis cannot be bought from base
typicality in any dimension, so a route to it has to say where the preparation sits — which is
exactly what one_sub_le_momentMap_of_near_pointer does. The two files are consistent and this one
prices the gap between them.
⚠️ It is not a refutation of anything. #105's hypothesis is about a particular preparation,
and a laboratory preparation is prepared, not sampled: measure_robustBasin_ge_of_pointer exhibits
the pointer state itself, so the exceptional set below is nonempty at every N and nothing here
makes the majority half vacuous. "Atypical" is a statement about Fubini–Study measure, not about
attainability.
⚠️ The Born weights are untouched. globalBasin_prob is exact at every base point, and nothing
below perturbs it. What is atypical is one cell dominating, not the cell law.
⚠️ One context, and one rate field. Everything is stated for momentContext — the standard-basis
context whose rate is the moment map. CellLawFreedom.lean exhibits a second, genuinely different
rate field (sqContext), and no statement here covers it: the Chebyshev input is about the moment
map specifically. Nor is anything claimed about a record string of several contexts; like #103's
and #105's majority statements, this is per-context.
⚠️ Nothing about the fibre. measure_recordString_ne_le's k·N·δ relabelling bound is a
statement about writes on the fibre and is not joined to anything here. The join this file makes is
between the base statistics and the majority half of #103, which is the half whose hypothesis was
unsupplied — the robustness half needs no hypothesis and is already unconditional.
⚠️ Polynomial, because its input is. The rate is Chebyshev-grade because
fs_chebyshev_concentration is: an exponential (Lévy) bound would sharpen every constant below and
is the named residual of Thermo/CanonicalTypicality.lean,
inside BACKLOG #24. Nothing here needs it.
⚠️ The hypothesis 1/N < 1 − ε is real. Below it the statement is empty rather than false: a
"majority" threshold at or under the typical weight 1/N is no threshold at all, and at N = 1 the
single outcome always has weight 1.
References: records-to-spacetime-scoping.md ST-3;
future-work.md; MacrostateStability.lean (#103),
PointerConcentration.lean (#105), GlobalBasin.lean, CellLawFreedom.lean,
Thermo/CanonicalTypicality.lean; specs/BACKLOG.md #140, #103, #105, #100.
One Born weight, read off the linear statistic #
★★ One outcome's weight concentrates at 1/N.
fs_chebyshev_concentration bounds the deviation of a linear diagonal statistic ∑ λₖ xₖ from
its mean. At the selector λ = δᵢ the statistic is the single Born weight momentMap p i, its
mean is 1/N, and the variance constant collapses to (N − 1)/(N²(N + 1)). This is the form the
record layer consumes, since a context's basin is indexed by one outcome.
The majority hypothesis #
★★★ #103's majority hypothesis is atypical.
A weight of 1 − ε or more is a deviation of at least 1 − ε − 1/N from the typical value, so the
Chebyshev bound applies directly. For fixed ε the right-hand side is O(1/N²).
★★★ Typically no outcome of the context is a majority. The union bound over the N
outcomes costs one factor N, so the price is O(1/N) rather than O(1/N²) — still vanishing,
and now a statement about the whole context rather than about a chosen outcome.
★★ The clean reading: the price is at most 1/N over the squared margin. (N − 1)/(N(N+1))
is at most 1/N, which is the form the row states and the form the limit is taken in.
The join: the basins of the canonical context #
★★★ The join #103's scope note says is missing.
The preparations at which some basin of the canonical context carries epistemic measure 1 − ε or
more have Fubini–Study measure at most 1/(N(1 − ε − 1/N)²). Nothing mediates between the weight
statement and the cell statement: globalBasin_prob makes a cell's measure exactly its rate, and
momentContext_rate makes that rate the moment map.
★★ The price vanishes with the dimension. For any threshold 1 − ε with ε < 1 the
typicality bound tends to 0, so the majority hypothesis is not merely untypical at a given N —
it becomes arbitrarily untypical as the arena grows.