Documentation

CsdLean4.RecordLayer.SharpenedNoGo

SigmaLayer/SharpenedNoGo: a positive-width ready region cannot hide the no-record set #

Category: dynamical measurement — specs/BACKLOG.md B5, the trilemma's third leg.

The question #

The third horn (NullSeamWitness.lean) achieves continuity and exact Born and records exact off a null seam — at the price of a Dirac-calibrated ready state. The trilemma claims that price is unavoidable: that with a ready region of positive width the no-record set stops being null. This module proves the qualitative half of that.

posMeasure_noRecord_of_isOpenMap: if the propagator is an open map and the ready set A is open, then as soon as some ready state is carried to a point in the closure of the no-record interior, the no-record preimage has positive measure.

The mechanism is exactly why a Dirac calibration escapes: Φ '' A is open, so it is not merely a point near the boundary — it contains a whole neighbourhood, and any neighbourhood of a boundary point of the no-record set meets that set's interior. A single calibrated point has no neighbourhood to spare, which is how the null-seam witness threads the kissing state exactly.

⚠️ What this does not prove — a correction to my own earlier claim #

NullSeamWitness.lean asserted that a positive-width ready region fattens the seam "to a positive-measure set of order the calibration width". The order is a quantitative claim, and it is not proved here and does not follow from this argument, which is purely topological. Getting O(δ) needs an estimate on how far the landing moments move as the ready state moves — real analysis, not soft topology. That over-assertion has been corrected at its source; what stands is the qualitative statement above.

Two further gaps, stated rather than papered over:

References #

specs/BACKLOG.md B5; SigmaLayer/NullSeamWitness.lean (the third horn, and the scope note corrected alongside this); SigmaLayer/MeasurementConstraints.lean (no_everywhere_correlation, whose connectedness argument the forcing step would reuse); SigmaLayer/NoRecordGeometry.lean (the geometric hypothesis hreg, discharged 2026-08-05); docs/TOUR.md §"Which horn is the right one?".

theorem CSD.RecordLayer.posMeasure_noRecord_of_isOpenMap {X : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace X] [MeasurableSpace X] {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure X} (hpos : ∀ (U : Set X), IsOpen UU.Nonemptyμ U 0) {Φ : XX} (hopen : IsOpenMap Φ) (hcont : Continuous Φ) {A R : Set X} (hA : IsOpen A) {a : X} (ha : a A) (hΦa : Φ a closure (interior R)) :
μ (A Φ ⁻¹' interior R) 0

A positive-width ready region cannot hide the no-record set. For an open-map, continuous propagator and an open ready set, if some ready state is carried into the closure of the no-record interior then the no-record preimage carries positive measure.

The hypothesis hpos — that the measure is positive on nonempty opens — is exactly what Fubini–Study satisfies (LF4.fubiniStudyMeasure_pos_of_isOpen), and is what makes "open" the operative word: a Dirac calibration has no open neighbourhood, which is precisely how the null-seam witness threads the boundary point exactly and keeps its seam null.

theorem CSD.RecordLayer.posMeasure_noRecord_unitary {K : } (q₀ : Pointer K) (U : (Matrix.unitaryGroup (Fin (K + 1)) )) {A R : Set (Pointer K)} (hA : IsOpen A) {a : Pointer K} (ha : a A) (hUa : U a closure (interior R)) :

The same statement for the pointer factor under a unitary stroke: a unitary acts as a homeomorphism of ℂℙ^K, so it is an open map, and Fubini–Study is positive on nonempty opens. This is the form the third horn's price takes.

★ The forcing step — no longer a hypothesis #

theorem CSD.RecordLayer.exists_noRecord_of_meets_two {X : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace X] {Φ : XX} (hcont : Continuous Φ) {A : Set X} (hconn : IsPreconnected A) {U V : Set X} (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (hUV : Disjoint U V) (hmeetU : xA, Φ x U) (hmeetV : xA, Φ x V) :
xA, Φ xU V

A correlating propagator must pass through the no-record set. The inverse of no_everywhere_correlation: rather than assuming the image is covered by two record regions and deriving False, conclude that it is not covered — some ready state lands outside both. Same connectedness argument, contrapositive shape.

theorem CSD.RecordLayer.posMeasure_noRecord_of_correlates {X : Type u_1} [TopologicalSpace X] [MeasurableSpace X] {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure X} (hpos : ∀ (W : Set X), IsOpen WW.Nonemptyμ W 0) {Φ : XX} (hopen : IsOpenMap Φ) (hcont : Continuous Φ) {A : Set X} (hA : IsOpen A) (hconn : IsPreconnected A) {U V : Set X} (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (hUV : Disjoint U V) (hreg : (U V)closure (interior (U V))) (hmeetU : xA, Φ x U) (hmeetV : xA, Φ x V) :
μ (A Φ ⁻¹' interior (U V)) 0

★★ The trilemma's third leg, with only a geometric hypothesis left. A continuous open-map propagator that correlates two outcomes on an open preconnected ready set gives the no-record set positive measure — provided the no-record set is regular (contained in the closure of its interior).

The hypotheses now split cleanly by kind: everything about the dynamics is discharged (continuity, openness, correlation), and the single remaining assumption hreg is a property of the record geometry alone. For the corpus's moment regions {m_{j+1} > 1/2} regularity is now a theorem — recordRegion_pair_compl_regular (SigmaLayer/NoRecordGeometry.lean, 2026-08-05) constructs the perturbation toward the ready vertex, and posMeasure_noRecord_pointer instantiates this statement with hreg discharged.

This is why the Dirac calibration escapes: hA : IsOpen A fails for a point.