SigmaLayer/OnticMarginals: A6 steps 2–3 — ontic reduction maps, and marginal stability #
Category: 7-SigmaLayer (Paper C A6 — composite systems).
What this adds #
Step 1 (OnticComposite.lean) made non-factorisation a theorem. This file supplies the other half
of A6's mathematical content:
- Step 2 — the ontic reduction maps. A composite ray has a density matrix (
rayDensity, ray-well-defined, unit trace), and its subsystem marginals are the partial traces (reduceA,reduceB). This is the ontic-levelr_S— the map from a point of the composite sector to what a subsystem observer can see of it. - Step 3 — marginal stability = ontic no-signalling. Under a local unitary on
A(the vector actionactA, with no Kronecker plumbing):- the
B-marginal is invariant (reduceB_pointA_invariant) — acting onAchanges nothingBcan see, at the level of the single ontic point; - the
A-marginal evolves by conjugation (reduceA_pointA_conj) — the Heisenberg transformation law. Instantiated at the Schrödinger unitaries (reduceB_local_flow_invariant): the local flow of anyA-Hamiltonian leaves theB-marginal fixed at every time. That is A6's "marginal stability", and it is the ontic-flow form of the corpus's operationaltensorSector_no_signalling.
- the
⚠️ Scope #
- These are kinematic identities about the reduction maps under local unitaries; they are exactly what A6's marginal-stability clause asserts, and nothing here claims a new dynamics.
- Step 4 of the plan — dynamical no-signalling through the v0.7.0 measurement layer (a protocol
acting on
A's register leaves the unconditionedB-marginal unchanged) — is not in this file. - The maps are defined at the projective level (the base of
Σ); the torus fibre plays no role in reduction, so theKSigmaform is the composition withProd.fstand is not separately stated.
References #
SigmaLayer/OnticComposite.lean (step 1); Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PartialTrace.lean
(traceRight, traceLeft); LF4/ProjectedDynamics.lean (schrodingerUnitary);
LF3/Projectors/TensorModel.lean, SigmaLayer/TensorSector.lean (the operational no-signalling
this is the ontic form of); specs/reconstruction-status.md §2 (the A6 row).
Step 2: the ray density and its marginals #
The density matrix of a composite ray: ρ(x,y) = v(x)·conj(v(y))/‖v‖² at the canonical
representative. Ray-well-defined (rayDensity_mk), unit trace (rayDensity_trace).
Equations
Instances For
The ray density has unit trace — it is a genuine state.
The A-marginal of a composite ray: trace out B.
Equations
Instances For
The B-marginal of a composite ray: trace out A.
Equations
Instances For
Step 3: local unitaries, and marginal stability #
The local A-action on composite vectors: (actA U v)(j,k) = ∑ₐ U j a · v(a,k) — the
vector form of U ⊗ 1, with no Kronecker plumbing.
Equations
Instances For
★ The workhorse: local sums against a unitary collapse. For UᴴU = 1,
∑ⱼ (actA U v)(j,k) · conj((actA U v)(j,k')) = ∑ₐ v(a,k) · conj(v(a,k'))
for every pair of B-indices — the invariance computation behind both the norm and the
B-marginal.
The local action on composite rays.
Equations
- CSD.RecordLayer.pointA hU p = Projectivization.mk ℂ (CSD.RecordLayer.actA U p.rep) ⋯
Instances For
★★ Marginal stability = ontic no-signalling. A local unitary on A leaves the
B-marginal of the composite ray unchanged: acting on A changes nothing B can see, at the
level of the single ontic point. This is Paper C A6's marginal-stability clause, and the ontic form
of the corpus's operational tensorSector_no_signalling.
The A-marginal evolves by conjugation — the Heisenberg transformation law for the
reduction map.
★★ Marginal stability under local flows. The Schrödinger flow of any A-Hamiltonian
leaves the B-marginal fixed at every time — A6's marginal-stability clause in flow form, the
ontic no-signalling statement.