SigmaLayer/KSigmaRecord: the record layer on the closure's actual product Σ (MD-1) #
Category: 7-SigmaLayer (the record layer — on the product model KSigma).
SigmaLayer/ProjectiveRecord.lean put the record layer on the projective base CPN (M+1). The
FiniteQMClosure capstone, however, lives on the product model Σ = KSigma (M+1) = CPN (M+1) × T²
(the torus factor carries the dynamics phase). This file lifts the record layer to that actual space
and — crucially — shows the closure's own Born-frequency region is the record-layer event.
kSigmaRecordSemantics— a postulate-P5RecordSemanticsonKSigma (M+1): the record event of outcomeiis the base Born region lifted through the base projectionπ = Prod.fst, measurable and exclusive (lifted frombornRegion_measurable_uncond/bornRegion_pairwiseDisjoint);kSigmaRecord_eq_baseProj— it is the projective record event pulled back alongπ;born_frequency_region_eq_record— the regionFiniteQMClosure.born_frequencylands in,π ⁻¹' bornRegion ψ i, is definitionally the record eventkSigmaRecordSemantics ⟨ψ,i,t⟩. So the pinned closure's Born frequencies already are frequencies of the record-layer record — the record layer is wired to the closure's actual field, with no rewrite of the pinned structure;bornOutcome_base_eq_record— the corpus's per-microstate outcome map reads the record onKSigma.
Honest scope. This is why the literal field re-plumbing of unifiedFiniteQMClosure is unnecessary,
not just risky: the closure's born_frequency region is already the record-layer event (definitionally),
so the record semantics is realised on the exact space and sets the closure uses. The closure's
records_time_physical still names the coarse-grained vnPointerOutcome (a block-sum of these
regions, vnPointerOutcome_preimage_some); rewriting that pinned statement carries no new theorem and is
deliberately not done. Foundational-triple, no sorry.
References #
SigmaLayer/ProjectiveRecord.lean (the base record layer); SigmaLayer/MeasureBridge.lean
(productSector, π = Prod.fst); SigmaLayer/FiniteQMClosure.lean (born_frequency, whose region this
is); LF4/KahlerInstance.lean (KSigma); LF5/PointerOutcome.lean (vnPointerOutcome, the coarse readout).
The base projection on the product model Σ = KSigma (M+1) = CPN × T².
Equations
Instances For
The record semantics (P5) on the actual product Σ = KSigma (M+1). The record event of
outcome i is the base Born region lifted through the base projection (the torus is a spectator):
measurable and exclusive, inherited from the base regions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The KSigma record event is the projective record event pulled back along the base projection.
The closure's Born-frequency region IS the record event. FiniteQMClosure.born_frequency lands
in π ⁻¹' bornRegion ψ i on the product Σ; that set is definitionally the record-layer event
kSigmaRecordSemantics for context ψ. So the pinned closure's Born frequencies already are
frequencies of the record-layer record — the record layer is wired to the closure's actual field with
no rewrite.
The corpus's per-microstate outcome map (on the base) reads the record on the full product Σ.