SigmaLayer/DeIsolationFlow: the de-isolation outcome distribution (MD-1, step 2b′) #
Category: 7-SigmaLayer (the record layer — the de-isolation flow's outcome distribution).
This is the outcome-distribution layer of the record layer (MD-1), built on the fibre partition
of BornFibrePartition.lean. Where that file gives the per-cell fibre measures, this file gives the
outcome distribution carried by the canonical fibre typicality measure fibreTypicality
(Lebesgue measure restricted to the unit fibre [0,1), a probability measure), and the abstract
de-isolation flow ⟹ Born bridge.
The picture (plan specs/record-layer-plan.md §3c): a measurement is a de-isolation flow Φ_M on
the fibred Σ; its pointer p = readout ∘ Φ_M : F → Fin n sends a fibre point to the outcome
whose basin it lands in, and Born is the fibre-typicality volume of the basin — a typicality
volume of a flow-carved basin, not injected noise.
What is proved here, foundational-triple, no sorry:
fibreTypicalityis a probability measure (instIsProbabilityMeasure,fibreTypicality_Ico01).- Outcome probability = Born weight: for a unit state the fibre typicality of the Born cell
iis exactly‖ψ i‖²(fibreTypicality_bornCell) — the outcome probability ofi. - The pointer is a.e. defined: the Born cells cover the fibre up to a null set
(
fibreTypicality_uncovered) — the outcome is determinedfibreTypicality-almost everywhere. - De-isolation flow ⟹ Born (
map_pointer_apply): any measurable pointerpwhose basins carry the Born cell measures pushesfibreTypicalityforward to the Born distribution — outcomeihas probability‖ψ i‖². This is the flow-independent content.
The open research obligation (the wall, plan §3c / staging step 2b′): exhibit a pointer p
generated by a physical de-isolation Hamiltonian H_int(M) — p = readout ∘ (flow of H_int(M)) —
whose basins are cdfCell (moment map). This file proves the Born conclusion from the basin
measures; it does not derive the basins from a Hamiltonian. map_pointer_apply makes the
remaining obligation precise: supply a measurable p with fibreTypicality (p⁻¹{i}) = ‖ψ i‖².
Status 2026-08-27 (RecordLayer/ShearDeIsolation.lean): the readout∘flow shape is exhibited —
shearDeIsolationInteraction's pointer is the constructed shear propagator's readout
(cellPointer_outcomeSector_eq_readout, pointwise) and its basin_rate is discharged from
shear_sector_born, on the fibred arena Σ_sel × T²_R with the ontic ready preparation
readyPrep [ψ] (not on this file's [0,1) fibre — per the 2026-08-26 scoping the cell shapes are
bookkeeping; the fibre, rates and selection are what is carried). The surviving residue is
ShearWitness item 1: the propagator's Hamiltonian generation is stated, not formalised (the
permanently-scoped symplectic row).
References #
specs/record-layer-plan.md §3c (the de-isolation flow / first-passage race; step 2b′);
SigmaLayer/BornFibrePartition.lean (the fibre partition — cdfCell, bornRate, volume_bornCell,
volume_iUnion_bornCell_unit); LF4/MomentMap.lean (momentMap_mk_eq_inner_sq, the rates).
The fibre typicality measure: Lebesgue measure restricted to the unit fibre [0,1). This is
the canonical typicality measure the de-isolation flow acts on; the outcome probabilities are the
fibre-typicality volumes of the basins.
Equations
Instances For
Outcome probability = Born weight. For a unit state the fibre typicality of the Born cell i
is exactly ‖ψ i‖² = |⟨eᵢ, ψ⟩|² — the de-isolation outcome i occurs with the Born probability.
The Born cells cover the unit fibre up to fibre-typicality 1.
The de-isolation pointer is defined almost everywhere. For a unit state the Born cells cover
the fibre [0,1) up to a fibreTypicality-null set: the outcome is determined a.e., there is no
positive-typicality set on which no outcome is recorded.
The [0,1) in fibreTypicality_uncovered is not forced: the same statement holds on
univ.
This corrects a reason that several record-layer modules gave for the restriction — that "Lebesgue
measure on the line is infinite". fibreTypicality is not Lebesgue measure on the line: it is
volume.restrict (Ico 0 1), a probability measure (instIsProbabilityMeasure, proved directly
above), so nothing about infinite mass obstructs the univ form.
⚠️ But this theorem is weaker than it looks, and that is the real difference from the compact fibre.
It holds because fibreTypicality assigns measure zero to everything outside [0,1)
(fibreTypicality_Ici_one): points off the unit fibre are excused by the measure, not covered by
cells. On CircleFibre the total mass one is Haar mass on a compact group rather than a restriction
imposed by hand, so there is nowhere for an uncovered point to hide. See
RecordLayer.circleBornMeasurement_ae_total.
Why the univ form above is cheap on ℝ. The unit fibre's complement carries infinite
Lebesgue measure but zero typicality: fibreTypicality excuses it by fiat. This is the honest
statement of what compactifying the fibre buys, and it is a fact about the restriction, not about
Lebesgue measure being infinite.
De-isolation flow ⟹ Born. Any measurable pointer p on the fibre whose basin p⁻¹{i} has
the Born cell measure pushes the fibre typicality forward to the Born distribution: the outcome-i
mass of fibreTypicality.map p is exactly ‖ψ i‖² = |⟨eᵢ, ψ⟩|².
This is the flow-independent content of step 2b′: given a de-isolation flow whose basins are the
moment-map/Born cells, the outcome distribution is Born. The open research obligation (plan §3c) is
to exhibit such a p generated by a physical de-isolation Hamiltonian H_int(M); that derivation
is not part of this theorem, whose hypothesis hbasin is exactly the obligation.