LF6-D (QM side): the maximally-entangled qutrit violates the CGLMP inequality #
Category: 6-Local (the d = 3-intrinsic Bell violation for Ψ_3, the QM-side
payoff of the CGLMP infrastructure Mathlib/Probability/CGLMP.lean).
The LF6-D non-factorisation of the general d × d maximally-entangled state Ψ_d
(no_product_partition_realises_maxEntangled) was, up to this file, forced through the
CHSH-violating 2 × 2 Schmidt (Φ⁺) sector: a genuinely derived violation, but a
two-outcome (CHSH) one, so not d-intrinsic. This module discharges the genuinely
d = 3 CGLMP violation for the maximally-entangled qutrit, closing that gap for d = 3.
What is proved #
Under the standard CGLMP phase-basis measurements on Ψ_3 (Alice offsets
α₁ = 0, α₂ = 1/2; Bob offsets β₁ = -1/4, β₂ = 1/4), the joint outcome-difference
Born probabilities pQM x y c = P(A_x − B_y = c) are computed from the Hilbert space
(pQM is the marginal sum of the genuine squared overlaps
bornPair x y k l = ‖⟨outcome_{k,l}, Ψ_3⟩‖², bornPair_value its closed form via the
roots-of-unity geometric sum). The four CGLMP-positive entries are (4 + 2√3)/9, the
four negative entries 1/9, giving the exact CGLMP value
I_3 = cglmp 3 pQM = (12 + 8√3)/9 ≈ 2.8729 (cglmp_maxEntangled_qutrit_eq)
which exceeds the local-hidden-variable bound 2 (cglmp_maxEntangled_qutrit_gt_two),
contradicting ProbabilityTheory.CGLMP.cglmp_lhv_bound_three (I_3 ≤ 2 for every
deterministic LHV model). Hence no local-hidden-variable model reproduces Ψ_3's
actual CGLMP outcome-difference statistics
(no_lhv_realises_maxEntangled_cglmp): a genuinely d = 3-intrinsic Bell force, not the
2 × 2 Φ⁺ CHSH sector.
Honest scope #
- The violation is a genuine computation from
Ψ_3's actual Born probabilities under real qutrit measurements:bornPairis a squared inner product withmaxEntangled 3, the outcome vectors are the CGLMP phase-basis measurement vectors (aVec_unit,bVec_unit: unit vectors), andpQM x y cis the genuine outcome-difference marginal (pQM,pQM_eq_pair:Borndepends only onk − lbybornPair_periodic). The value(12 + 8√3)/9is not asserted; every step is derived, the√3irrational (no rational analogue violates — half-integer offsets give exactly2). - The LHV bound
I_3 ≤ 2is imported fromcglmp_lhv_bound_three(thed = 3finite optimisation,decideover the 81 strategies). This file supplies the QM side. d = 3only. The general-d(d ≥ 4) CGLMP violation forΨ_dremains the residual.- Foundational-triple-only (no
busch_effect_gleason; the geometric sums and the finite LHV optimisation are both Gleason-free).
Reference: Collins, Gisin, Linden, Massar, Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404
(2002). specs/lf6-plan.md (LF6-D).
The CGLMP qutrit measurement settings #
The combined offset δ = α_x − β_y.
Equations
Instances For
Alice's CGLMP phase-basis measurement vector |k⟩_{A,x} = (1/√3) ∑_j ω^{j(k+α_x)} |j⟩
(ω = e^{2πi/3}), a unit vector (aVec_unit).
Equations
- CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.aVec x k = WithLp.toLp 2 fun (j : Fin 3) => (↑√3)⁻¹ * Complex.exp (↑(CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.aAngle x k j) * Complex.I)
Instances For
Bob's CGLMP phase-basis measurement vector
|l⟩_{B,y} = (1/√3) ∑_j ω^{-j(l+β_y)} |j⟩, a unit vector (bVec_unit).
Equations
- CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.bVec y l = WithLp.toLp 2 fun (j : Fin 3) => (↑√3)⁻¹ * Complex.exp (↑(CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.bAngle y l j) * Complex.I)
Instances For
The joint measurement outcome vector |k⟩_{A,x} ⊗ |l⟩_{B,y} on
EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin 3 × Fin 3).
Equations
- CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.outcome x y k l = WithLp.toLp 2 fun (p : Fin 3 × Fin 3) => (CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.aVec x k).ofLp p.1 * (CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.bVec y l).ofLp p.2
Instances For
The joint Born probability P(A_x = k, B_y = l) = ‖⟨outcome_{k,l}, Ψ_3⟩‖²: the
genuine squared overlap of the outcome vector with the maximally-entangled qutrit
maxEntangled 3.
Equations
- CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.bornPair x y k l = ‖inner ℂ (CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.outcome x y k l) (CSD.LF6.maxEntangled 3)‖ ^ 2
Instances For
The outcome vectors are unit vectors (genuine measurements) #
The Born probability closed form (roots-of-unity geometric sum) #
The inner product with Ψ_3 collapses onto the diagonal: only the (i,i) amplitudes
survive the maximally-entangled contraction.
The joint Born probability closed form. From the diagonal collapse, the conjugated
amplitudes are (1/3)·(e^{iφ})^i, φ = baseAngle; the geometric sum and normSq_geom
give bornPair = (1/27)(3 + 4cos φ + 2cos 2φ).
The joint Born probability depends only on the outcome difference k − l (mod 3):
the geometric-sum phase is periodic in the integer difference. This is the genuine
"outcome-difference" structure of the CGLMP measurement.
The genuine CGLMP outcome-difference Born table for Ψ_3:
pQM x y c = P(A_x − B_y = c), the sum over outcome pairs (k, l) with k − l = c of
the joint Born probabilities bornPair x y k l.
Equations
- CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.pQM x y c = ∑ l : ZMod 3, CSD.LF6.CGLMPQutrit.bornPair x y (c + l) l
Instances For
The eight CGLMP-relevant Born values #
Four positive entries (4 + 2√3)/9 (base angle ± π/6), four negative entries 1/9
(base angle ± π/2), evaluated at the small representatives k − l ∈ {-1, 0, 1}.
The CGLMP value and the violation #
The maximally-entangled qutrit CGLMP value. I_3 = (12 + 8√3)/9 ≈ 2.8729,
computed from Ψ_3's actual Born probabilities under the CGLMP phase-basis
measurements.
The qutrit CGLMP violation (QM side). Ψ_3 violates the CGLMP inequality: its
CGLMP value (12 + 8√3)/9 ≈ 2.8729 exceeds the local-hidden-variable bound 2. Genuinely
d = 3-intrinsic (the √3 is irrational; no rational / half-integer setting choice
violates).
The d = 3-intrinsic no-go (LF6-D, CGLMP routing). No local-hidden-variable
model (Λ, μ, A, B) reproduces Ψ_3's actual CGLMP outcome-difference Born statistics
pQM: such a model would have CGLMP value cglmpLHV = cglmp 3 pQM = (12 + 8√3)/9 > 2,
contradicting the LHV bound cglmp_lhv_bound_three (I_3 ≤ 2). This is the genuinely
d = 3 Bell force for the maximally-entangled qutrit, superseding the 2 × 2 Φ⁺ CHSH
sector of no_product_partition_realises_maxEntangled.