Documentation

CsdLean4.Empirical.QM.MeasurementAdderHierarchy

EC-3 capstone: the measurement-discipline adder hierarchy #

Category: 3-Local (the measurement-discipline adder hierarchy).

Two adder families carry the safegcd / point-op cost model, and each has a unitary and a measurement-discipline cost:

adderunitarymeasurement-discipline
AND-based (AndAdd.lean, #30)6n (andAdd_toffoli)3n (andAdd_measurement_toffoli, EC-6/L5-d)
Gidney (GidneyAdder.lean, #35)2n (gidneyAdd_toffoli)n (gidneyMeasAddToffoli_eq, EC-3)

This module states the full ordering as one theorem, each entry a PROVEN circuit cost (not an assumed figure): the measurement-discipline Gidney adder at n Toffoli is the cheapest of the four, strictly below the unitary Gidney (2n), the measurement AND-adder (3n), and the unitary AND-adder (6n).

Honest scope #

Every cost here is a proven Reversible.circuitCost … .toffoli figure; the measurement-discipline figures are cost re-costs whose per-AND-block replacement is proven-equivalent (andUncompute_measureUncompute_same_data, data effect + 0 Toffoli). The CHANNEL-level proof that the n measurement gadgets composed reproduce the unitary uncompute's data effect on the WHOLE register (the tensor composition over all cells) is the standing residual shared by EC-3 and EC-6 — proved per block, aggregated in cost. No amplitudes or ECDSA-score claim here; just the adder cost ordering.

The measurement-discipline adder hierarchy (all four costs, each proven). For n-matched layouts: the measurement Gidney adder costs n, the unitary Gidney adder 2n, the measurement AND-adder 3n, and the unitary AND-adder 6n.

The measurement Gidney adder is the cheapest of the four (for n ≥ 1): its n Toffoli beat the unitary Gidney (2n), the measurement AND-adder (3n), and the unitary AND-adder (6n). The final score lever on the adder side — the least-Toffoli reversible adder in the corpus, verified.