Empirical/CSD: No-broadcasting (CSD-side reading) #
Category: 3-Local (CSD-side companion to Empirical/QM/NoBroadcasting.lean).
Pairs with Empirical/QM/NoBroadcasting.lean (Barnum-Caves-Fuchs-Jozsa-Schumacher
1996). The QM file states the pure-marginal core as a matrix theorem: a bipartite PSD
operator ρ whose first-factor marginal is a pure state |ψ⟩⟨ψ| is confined to that
pure sector, (|ψ⟩⟨ψ| ⊗ I)·ρ·(|ψ⟩⟨ψ| ⊗ I) = ρ. No CSD ontology in the proof.
This file states the CSD volume-ratio reading: the same confinement applied to a
CSD-realised bipartite state. The would-be broadcaster's joint ontic state, having the
pure ψ-sector as its system marginal, has no support outside that one-dimensional
sector, so there is no room for an independent second copy. This is the structural
squeeze behind "broadcasting a pure state would clone it" carried into the CSD substrate.
Polarity (transport, not negative-existential) #
Like Uncertainty and unlike NoCloning, this is a positive-content transport: every
bundle satisfies the confinement identity, by direct appeal to the QM-side theorem.
LF4 obligations carried #
The bundle's load-bearing content is the realisability of the bipartite density
operator ρ (and its pure marginal) through the CSD ontic substrate — the
state/operator correspondence family (LF4-todo §14): the Hilbert-side ρ arises as a
CSD object on Σ whose system-marginal reduction is the pure ψ-sector. Pre-LF4 the
ontic realisation is implicit in the bundle's existence; post-LF4 it follows from the
concrete SectorData instantiation. See BRIDGE-OBLIGATIONS.md and PLACEHOLDERS.md §7
(the bundle's fields are Hilbert-side; the ontic correspondence is prose-only).
Source #
Barnum, Caves, Fuchs, Jozsa, Schumacher 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2818.
SCHEMA-MISMATCH: docstring claims CSD-side content the type does not carry. Fields are Hilbert-side; the state/operator-correspondence claim is prose-only.
CSD no-broadcasting bundle. Structural carrier for a bipartite PSD operator ρ
with a pure first-factor marginal |ψ⟩⟨ψ|, packaged in a SectorData D context.
Extends CSDBridge.Context D (the LF2-level discharge data) and adds the Hilbert-side
state structure. The fields match the argument list of
Empirical.QM.NoBroadcasting.pure_marginal_confinement exactly, so the reduction in
csd_no_broadcasting is mechanical.
LF4-discharge content (prose-only; no field encodes this) #
By calling the structure CSDNoBroadcastingBundle, callers implicitly assert that ρ
arises as a CSD bipartite state on the substrate of D, with its system-marginal
reduction realising the pure ψ-sector.
Status: load-bearing, externally supplied, undischarged. LF4-todo §14.
- bridge : LF2.MeasureBridgeData D self.μFS
- ψ : EuclideanSpace ℂ (Fin N)
The pure system state whose marginal confines
ρ. The bipartite density operator of the prospective broadcaster.
- hρ : self.ρ.PosSemidef
The first-factor marginal is the pure state
|ψ⟩⟨ψ|.
Instances For
TRANSPORT-ONLY: proof body unpacks the bundle's Hilbert-side fields and calls
the QM-side theorem. See PLACEHOLDERS.md §7.
No-broadcasting in the CSD reading. For any CSD no-broadcasting bundle on a
SectorData D, the joint state is confined to the pure ψ-sector:
(|ψ⟩⟨ψ| ⊗ I)·ρ·(|ψ⟩⟨ψ| ⊗ I) = ρ. Reduces to the QM-side
Empirical.QM.NoBroadcasting.pure_marginal_confinement by direct field extraction.
Experimental verification: the impossibility underlies the security of prepare-and-measure QKD; the marginal-confinement core is checked in any state-tomography reconstruction of a broadcasting attempt.