Documentation

CsdLean4.Empirical.CSD.Crypto.E91

Empirical/CSD: E91 device-independent security (CSD-side reading) #

Category: 3-Local (CSD-side companion to Empirical/QM/Crypto/E91.lean).

Pairs with Empirical/QM/Crypto/E91.lean (Ekert 1991; CHSH 1969). The QM file builds a genuine measure-theoretic local-hidden-variable model — a hidden-variable probability space (Λ, μ) with ±1 local responses — and proves the Bell/CHSH bound |S| ≤ 2, together with the device-independent witness that the singlet attains 2√2 > 2 and so is unreproducible by any LHV model.

This file states the CSD reading, whose polarity is the sharpest in the suite. A CSDLHVBundle posits a local-realist reading of the CSD source: a hidden-variable space (Λ, μ) with ±1 responses standing in for a would-be local description of the ontic substrate. The theorem csd_lhv_chsh_bound shows every such reading is capped at |S| ≤ 2. CSD's own predictions, by contrast, reach the Tsirelson value 2√2 — the singlet correlation −cos θ is derived on the CSD substrate in Empirical/CSD/BellVolume.lean (bell_singlet_volume_correlation) as a Fubini-Study volume, and at the CHSH angles this gives |S| = 2√2. So the CSD source provably has no local-realist (LHV) description: CSD is a non-local-realist ontic theory, exactly as device-independent security requires.

Polarity (no undischarged realisability obligation) #

Unlike the other bridges, this one carries no LF4 realisability marker. The bundle's LHV fields are not claimed to be CSD-realisable; the content is the opposite — the bound certifies that a local-realist reading cannot match CSD's derived Tsirelson value. The transport is therefore a clean reduction with no externally-supplied ontic posit.

Source #

Ekert 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661; CHSH 1969, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880.

structure CSD.Empirical.CSDBridge.E91.CSDLHVBundle {SigmaSpace : Type u_1} {P : Type u_2} {G : Type u_3} [MeasurableSpace SigmaSpace] [Nonempty SigmaSpace] [MeasurableSpace P] [Group G] [MulAction G SigmaSpace] [MulAction G P] [MulAction.IsPretransitive G P] (D : LF2.SectorData SigmaSpace P G) (Λ : Type u_4) [MeasurableSpace Λ] (SettingA : Type u_5) (SettingB : Type u_6) extends CSD.Empirical.CSDBridge.Context D :
Type (max (max (max u_2 u_4) u_5) u_6)

CSD LHV bundle. A posited local-realist reading of the CSD source: a hidden-variable probability space (Λ, μ) with ±1-valued, measurable local response functions A, B, packaged in a SectorData D context. Extends CSDBridge.Context D. The fields match the argument list of Empirical.QM.E91.lhvCHSH_abs_le_two.

No LF4 realisability marker: the bundle's LHV fields are deliberately not asserted to be CSD-realisable. The point of csd_lhv_chsh_bound is that any such reading is bounded away from CSD's derived Tsirelson value.

Instances For
    theorem CSD.Empirical.CSDBridge.E91.csd_lhv_chsh_bound {SigmaSpace : Type u_1} {P : Type u_2} {G : Type u_3} [MeasurableSpace SigmaSpace] [Nonempty SigmaSpace] [MeasurableSpace P] [Group G] [MulAction G SigmaSpace] [MulAction G P] [MulAction.IsPretransitive G P] {D : LF2.SectorData SigmaSpace P G} {Λ : Type u_4} [MeasurableSpace Λ] {SettingA : Type u_5} {SettingB : Type u_6} (bun : CSDLHVBundle D Λ SettingA SettingB) (a a' : SettingA) (b b' : SettingB) :
    |QM.E91.lhvCHSH bun.μ bun.A bun.B a a' b b'| 2

    TRANSPORT-ONLY: proof body unpacks the bundle's LHV fields and calls the QM-side theorem.

    The Bell/CHSH bound in the CSD reading. Any posited local-realist reading of the CSD source obeys |S| ≤ 2. Reduces to the QM-side Empirical.QM.E91.lhvCHSH_abs_le_two by direct field extraction. Combined with the derived CSD singlet correlation reaching the Tsirelson value 2√2 (Empirical/CSD/BellVolume.lean), this certifies that the CSD source admits no local-realist description — the device-independent security guarantee.

    Experimental verification: Ekert 1991; loophole-free Bell tests Hensen 2015, Giustina 2015, Shalm 2015.